<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Babu Srinivasan's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.srinivasan.biz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz</link>
	<description>Random musings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on One term President? by Some ceiling will be broken &#8212; guaranteed &#124; Babu Srinivasan's blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/18/one-term-president/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Some ceiling will be broken &#8212; guaranteed &#124; Babu Srinivasan's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=38#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] has picked a 44 year old to be a heartbeat away from Presidency. See my previous blog entry titled One term President: McCain says &#8220;If I said I was running for eight years, I’m not sure that would be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has picked a 44 year old to be a heartbeat away from Presidency. See my previous blog entry titled One term President: McCain says &#8220;If I said I was running for eight years, I’m not sure that would be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paul MacCready: Flying on solar wings by Independence from oil: Just plug it in &#124; Babu Srinivasan's blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/19/paul-maccready-flying-on-solar-wings/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Independence from oil: Just plug it in &#124; Babu Srinivasan's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=21#comment-74</guid>
		<description>[...] we can fly aeroplanes without oil (see video), we need oil and this can also be satisfied by Alberta&#8217;s oil sands. Canada is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we can fly aeroplanes without oil (see video), we need oil and this can also be satisfied by Alberta&#8217;s oil sands. Canada is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Condi Rice says &#8220;Go easy on the rice&#8221; by Babu Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/04/condi-rice-says-go-easy-on-the-rice/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=32#comment-69</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/opinion/28sen.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow"&gt;NY Times OpEd piece by Amartya Sen: The Rich Get Hungrier&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/28/opinion/28sen.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">NY Times OpEd piece by Amartya Sen: The Rich Get Hungrier</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What was she thinking? by Babu Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/24/what-was-she-thinking/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=44#comment-64</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/opinion/25dowd.html?em&#038;ex=1211860800&#038;en=43b443e1c5d50eb2&#038;ei=5087%0A" rel="nofollow"&gt;Maureen Dowd: All About Eve&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/opinion/25dowd.html?em&#038;ex=1211860800&#038;en=43b443e1c5d50eb2&#038;ei=5087%0A" rel="nofollow">Maureen Dowd: All About Eve</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McCain: how low can you get? by Babu Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/11/36/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=36#comment-43</guid>
		<description>You are right. The reality is that there will be lot of negative ads from both campaigns. Obama indirectly hinted at the age issue by saying "that McCain is losing his bearings". 

You write well. You should have a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. The reality is that there will be lot of negative ads from both campaigns. Obama indirectly hinted at the age issue by saying &#8220;that McCain is losing his bearings&#8221;. </p>
<p>You write well. You should have a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McCain: how low can you get? by burdenedbytax</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/11/36/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>burdenedbytax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=36#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Contrary to news reports, rumors are that the McCain-Obama campaign will be ugly. George Soros has setup a $40 million fund raiser to setup 527 groups to launch dirty attacks on McCain. The key issues will be his age, his Keating trouble, his 100-year Iraq policy, his flip-flop on Bush tax cuts and his anger management problems. They will paint him as a old senile man who is not fit to be a commander-in-chief.

On the other hand, Republicans will paint Obama as this "mystery" candidate about whom no one really knows anything and that beneath the layers, he is simply a left wing elitist liberal who will raise taxes, expand government, run up deficits further and facilitate the far-left policies of Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry, Reid, talk to Ahmed-in-his Jammies, etc.

I personally do not agree with a multitude of Obama's policies (the ones he has grudgingly talked about). However, his undoing in the fall might be simply that Americans will not elect a black liberal for President. His vote bank has been youth, far left liberals and blacks, from state to state to state. He did successfully get them to vote. However he has failed to win over the rural voters and blue collar voters in the Democratic ranks. In the general election, rural voters (Dems and Republicans) will go fot McCain across the board. The blue collar Reagan Democrats could go McCain's way, especially in Ohio, PA, Missouri, Indiana, etc. And there are a few states that Obama cannot win (my prediction); Virginia, NC, SC, Georgia, Alabama, MS, Texas, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, TN, KY, OK. Even Florida is unclear as Jews seem to favor McCain (Obama has said pro Palestinian things); NW Florida is Republican. So, from an electoral college map perspective, it is an uphill battle, especially if many Hillary supporters cross over and vote for McCain. Obama cannot rely on just the liberals in east coast and west coast to win. Also, the black vote (&#62;90% everywhere) helped him in the primaries. But in general, black vote does not count for that much, especially in the South.

For Obama to win, he has to show that he can go beyond his base of blacks, liberals and youth and he has to show that he can win in non-urban areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to news reports, rumors are that the McCain-Obama campaign will be ugly. George Soros has setup a $40 million fund raiser to setup 527 groups to launch dirty attacks on McCain. The key issues will be his age, his Keating trouble, his 100-year Iraq policy, his flip-flop on Bush tax cuts and his anger management problems. They will paint him as a old senile man who is not fit to be a commander-in-chief.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Republicans will paint Obama as this &#8220;mystery&#8221; candidate about whom no one really knows anything and that beneath the layers, he is simply a left wing elitist liberal who will raise taxes, expand government, run up deficits further and facilitate the far-left policies of Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry, Reid, talk to Ahmed-in-his Jammies, etc.</p>
<p>I personally do not agree with a multitude of Obama&#8217;s policies (the ones he has grudgingly talked about). However, his undoing in the fall might be simply that Americans will not elect a black liberal for President. His vote bank has been youth, far left liberals and blacks, from state to state to state. He did successfully get them to vote. However he has failed to win over the rural voters and blue collar voters in the Democratic ranks. In the general election, rural voters (Dems and Republicans) will go fot McCain across the board. The blue collar Reagan Democrats could go McCain&#8217;s way, especially in Ohio, PA, Missouri, Indiana, etc. And there are a few states that Obama cannot win (my prediction); Virginia, NC, SC, Georgia, Alabama, MS, Texas, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, TN, KY, OK. Even Florida is unclear as Jews seem to favor McCain (Obama has said pro Palestinian things); NW Florida is Republican. So, from an electoral college map perspective, it is an uphill battle, especially if many Hillary supporters cross over and vote for McCain. Obama cannot rely on just the liberals in east coast and west coast to win. Also, the black vote (&gt;90% everywhere) helped him in the primaries. But in general, black vote does not count for that much, especially in the South.</p>
<p>For Obama to win, he has to show that he can go beyond his base of blacks, liberals and youth and he has to show that he can win in non-urban areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isn&#8217;t &#8216;winning&#8217; the best brand ambassador? by burdenedbytax</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/05/07/isnt-winning-the-best-brand-ambassador/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>burdenedbytax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=33#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I agree. The elitist members of IPL, namely Mallya and Shah Rukh Khan have tried to bring in business with added attractions. But ultimately, these are short-lived and only real success on the field will bring business revenues in for each team. After a while, celebrities will become a part of the landscape of each match and their stock will fall. From what I can see so far, I am still trying to see how all these IPL teams will be profitable. Ambani, Mallya, Srinivasan can hide expenses in their other companies, but others will have to take big losses in the first couple of years and whether their investors will keep the faith remains to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The elitist members of IPL, namely Mallya and Shah Rukh Khan have tried to bring in business with added attractions. But ultimately, these are short-lived and only real success on the field will bring business revenues in for each team. After a while, celebrities will become a part of the landscape of each match and their stock will fall. From what I can see so far, I am still trying to see how all these IPL teams will be profitable. Ambani, Mallya, Srinivasan can hide expenses in their other companies, but others will have to take big losses in the first couple of years and whether their investors will keep the faith remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;obnoxious little weed&#8221;, indeed by Babu Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/28/obnoxious-little-weed-indeed/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=30#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Bhajji has been fried --- that slap has cost him over 2 crores, and he has been banned for 11 matches. He is out of the IPL. He may also be banned for some ODI and test matches. Sreesanth has been warned. It seems that an umpire also has been banned for 2 matches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bhajji has been fried &#8212; that slap has cost him over 2 crores, and he has been banned for 11 matches. He is out of the IPL. He may also be banned for some ODI and test matches. Sreesanth has been warned. It seems that an umpire also has been banned for 2 matches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;obnoxious little weed&#8221;, indeed by burdenedbytax</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/28/obnoxious-little-weed-indeed/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>burdenedbytax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=30#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I believe that both Bhajji and Sreesanth have repeatedly shown that they cannot control their emotions on the field. Their captains have not also been able to reign them in. The BCCI has not strongly advised them as yet. Time has come for some strong measures to be taken. I would recommend a 1 year ban on both players, although 1 year is eternity in modern cricket. It serves them well, because both have grown arrogant and have come to think that they can get away with their antics and bad behavior. They have become a laughing stock among other international players. They have also become an embarassment for the BCCI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that both Bhajji and Sreesanth have repeatedly shown that they cannot control their emotions on the field. Their captains have not also been able to reign them in. The BCCI has not strongly advised them as yet. Time has come for some strong measures to be taken. I would recommend a 1 year ban on both players, although 1 year is eternity in modern cricket. It serves them well, because both have grown arrogant and have come to think that they can get away with their antics and bad behavior. They have become a laughing stock among other international players. They have also become an embarassment for the BCCI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google should fix their broken account creation process by Babu Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/26/google-should-fix-their-broken-account-creation-process/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Babu Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srinivasan.biz/?p=28#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I have a simple idea for no-spam gmail account creation.

In my &lt;a href="http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/26/google-should-fix-their-broken-account-creation-process/" rel="nofollow"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; and previous comment, I had described why I think the gmail account creation procedure is flawed and how it can be fixed. While my suggestion, if implemented, is an improvement over the current mechanism, there is still the problem where google sends email to whatever address is specified in the account creation form --- causing spam if the address is deliberately or accidentally misspelled.

I have a simple idea to avoid this spam.
If the user provides a secondary email address along with other information required for account creation, and if the login name is available, the form displays a verification code. The user can activate the gmail account by sending an email from the secondary email address --- proving ownership of the address --- with the verification code. If the 2 email addresses don't match, account is not created. Note that though it is easy to spoof the "From" address, the spoofster --- I made up the word just now! --- won't know the secondary email address nor the verification code. Ofcourse, Google will get lot of spam activation emails but it should be able to filter them out.

This obviously applies not just to gmail accounts but any other account.

Comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a simple idea for no-spam gmail account creation.</p>
<p>In my <a href="http://blog.srinivasan.biz/2008/04/26/google-should-fix-their-broken-account-creation-process/" rel="nofollow">post</a> and previous comment, I had described why I think the gmail account creation procedure is flawed and how it can be fixed. While my suggestion, if implemented, is an improvement over the current mechanism, there is still the problem where google sends email to whatever address is specified in the account creation form &#8212; causing spam if the address is deliberately or accidentally misspelled.</p>
<p>I have a simple idea to avoid this spam.<br />
If the user provides a secondary email address along with other information required for account creation, and if the login name is available, the form displays a verification code. The user can activate the gmail account by sending an email from the secondary email address &#8212; proving ownership of the address &#8212; with the verification code. If the 2 email addresses don&#8217;t match, account is not created. Note that though it is easy to spoof the &#8220;From&#8221; address, the spoofster &#8212; I made up the word just now! &#8212; won&#8217;t know the secondary email address nor the verification code. Ofcourse, Google will get lot of spam activation emails but it should be able to filter them out.</p>
<p>This obviously applies not just to gmail accounts but any other account.</p>
<p>Comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
